Roe versus Wade

Susan Collins, the moderate Republican Maine senator considered a key vote on a pending U.S. Supreme Court nominee, made a bizarre observation the other day.

Collins said she could not support a nominee who might consider overturning Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion on demand, because such a position “would indicate an activist agenda.”

Overturning Roe v. Wade would not be judicial activism. Rather, the 45-year-old decision itself fits that definition. The court majority at the time fabricated a right to privacy in the Constitution so that it could impose on this nation what it thought was a social good — the ability of a woman anywhere to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.

To return abortion policy back to the states would be a negation of activism, not an expression of it.

Breaking News

Randy Watkins’ love of golf takes him to the U.S. Open and mentoring young players on the sport.


William Sherman Sampson Jr., 75, died unexpectedly Saturday July 13, 2019 at his home near Learned... READ MORE


Jackson Prep freshmen earning Subject Area Awards are (from left, back) Wayne Hsieh, Coding Award; Chambers Malouf, French II Award; Jeffrey Jordan, Latin II Award; (third row) Owen Abney, Honors