Roe versus Wade

Susan Collins, the moderate Republican Maine senator considered a key vote on a pending U.S. Supreme Court nominee, made a bizarre observation the other day.

Collins said she could not support a nominee who might consider overturning Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion on demand, because such a position “would indicate an activist agenda.”

Overturning Roe v. Wade would not be judicial activism. Rather, the 45-year-old decision itself fits that definition. The court majority at the time fabricated a right to privacy in the Constitution so that it could impose on this nation what it thought was a social good — the ability of a woman anywhere to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.

To return abortion policy back to the states would be a negation of activism, not an expression of it.

Breaking News

A new service with the Jackson-Hinds Library System has made hundreds of thousands of books... READ MORE


Mrs. Mary Margaret Bond Perry, 87 of Farmerville, LA, passed away on October 10, 2019.  She was... READ MORE


The Millsaps College football team opened up the 2019 season with the Riverside Rumble against cross-town rival Belhaven University.